For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Risks

Interacting with any DeFi protocol carries risk of loss, and Resupply is no exception. Read this section and the audits before supplying funds.

Resupply-specific risks

  • Peg risk – reUSD is backed by stablecoin denominated lending positions and is kept near $1.00 by a redemption floor (~$1.00 − fee). Prolonged depegs raise borrowing costs (off-peg fee) and can trigger redemptions against your position.

  • Collateral risk – markets accept volatile collateral (WETH, wstETH, WBTC, …, plus stablecoins). A sharp move down can liquidate positions (5% liquidation fee); liquidations settle through the Insurance Pool.

  • Insurance Pool tail risk – insurance stakers earn yield for bearing exactly this risk; in a mass-liquidation or bad debt event, pool reUSD is burned and holders absorb the loss beyond pool cover.

  • Lending-market / integration risk – funds sit in Curve Lend, Curve Lend v2 and Fraxlend positions; a bug, exploit or insolvency in those platforms (or their reward vaults — Convex/Yearn) could impair collateral. sreUSD additionally carries bridge risk (LayerZero OFT).

  • Governance risk – RSUP governance can adjust fees, limits, and permissions by vote (30% quorum); staked weight concentration means a majority coalition controls the protocol.

  • Oracle / keeper reliance – interest, liquidations and borrow-limit ramps rely on oracles and the protocol keeper; degraded operation can delay liquidations.

Third-party reviews always apply

Convex Finance, Curve Finance, Frax Finance, LlamaLend v2, and LayerZero carry their own risks — review their docs and risk frameworks too.

Last updated